Author Archives: Chris Heard

Snippets from the history of gameful learning

A collection of old gamesIs this a keyboard I see before me, its letters toward my hand? Why, it certainly is, and now I find myself writing the first Higgaion post in quite a long time. I’m working with some other Pepperdine folk on a workshop intended to encourage and support what we call “gameful learning.” We use this term to describe everything from using games and simulations in class to structuring entire courses like alternate reality games.

While typing an e-mail to one of my colleagues, I noticed that my Mac’s built-in dictionary doesn’t recognize the word gameful, so I decided to investigate the word using Google’s Ngram Viewer. I found a few interesting snippets.

John Ogilvie’s Imperial Dictionary of the English Language (1883) defines gameful as “full of sport or games; sportive.” Ogilvie also notes Alexander Pope’s use of gameful to mean “full of animals that people like to hunt and eat.”

The earliest reference I have found to gameful learning comes in Samuel Chester Parker, “How to Teach Beginning Reading, I,” The Elementary School Journal 22 (1921): 15–30. In this article, Parker describes how Marjorie Hardy, a first-grade teacher at the University of Chicago Elementary School, used “[f]ive weeks of gameful pre-primer blackborad [sic] and chart reading to initiate correct reading attitudes and habits” (1921: 30).

In another work, Parker addresses games and sports in a different way, advising high-school teachers to “develop positive recreational interests” (Exercises for “Methods of Teaching in High Schools”: A Problem-Solving Method in a Social Science [rev. ed.; Boston: Ginn and Co., 1922], E255). I think I might need to tape the following to my bathroom mirror:

If a teacher works effectively eight hours a day at his public-service teaching and in preparation for it, he has done sufficient for his country, and several of the remaining hours should be spent in irresponsible, interesting, enjoyable activities which will replace in his mind his responsible lines of thought and allow these to subside until they are needed when teaching begins again. The varied spectator activities described above, especially pleasing stories and the drama, and the observation of interesting, attractive persons at play furnish some of the most effective and pleasing temporary memories and trains of images to occupy one’s mind. “Contemplative play” (a term coined by Thorndike) contains a happy suggestion of the desirable frame of mind which results. (1922: E255)

Parker goes on to particularly recommend that teachers “[p]lay outdoor games for exercise and for complacent contemplation” (1922: E255). Sounds like I need to go home, watch TV, play games with my family, and take my dog to the park.

Well, I’ve strayed from the original point(lessness). Back to my “responsible lines of thought.”

Martin Luther on astrology

“… Augustine condemned all astrology. Although it contains much superstition, yet it should not be entirely despised, for it is wholly given up to the observation and consideration of divine themes, a zeal and diligence most worthy of human beings. Therefore we find that many most highly talented and excellent persons have exercised themselves in astrology and obtained pleasure from it.” — Martin Luther, Lectures on Genesis, vol. 1 (ed. John Nicholas Lenker, 1904), 74

Not that Luther was ever reluctant to disagree with Augustine, but I can’t help wondering which “highly talented and excellent persons” Luther had in mind, and why they were so important to him that he characterized astrology as good clean fun rather than pagan drivel.

Mac apps and Biblical Hebrew update: ditch your Tiro keyboard

If you’re frustrated with your attempts at right-to-left text processing on a Macintosh, the problem may lie in your keyboard layout. For quite a while now, I’ve been using the Biblical Hebrew keyboard layout prepared by Tiro Typeworks and distributed by the Society of Biblical Literature. Two or three days ago, though, I discovered that the vast majority of my frustrations with right-to-left text processing on a Macintosh were caused by using the Tiro keyboard layout.

Continue reading

I hope so

When the shampoo bottle says “Lather. Rinse. Repeat,” we don’t spend the rest of our lives in the shower. We infer that it means “repeat once.” And we know how to interpret ambiguous headlines such as “Kids Make Nutritious Snacks,” “Prostitutes Appeal to Pope,” and “British Left Waffles on Falkland Islands” … (Steven Pinker, The Blank Slate)

“Noah” and environmentalism

By now it’s almost become old hat: read a Christian’s negative review of Noah, and at some point you’ll find the film criticized for heavy-handed environmentalism. For example, in an excessively vituperative review on the Christian Post website, Brian Godawa writes:

Christians, you are tools being played if you think that this movie is anything BUT a subversion of the Biblical God and an exaltation of environmentalism and animal rights against humans. Don’t listen to those who say that hurting the earth is just part of the sins of mankind in the story. No matter what “sins” of man that are portrayed in this story, they are clearly only expressions of the ultimate sin, which is to sin against the earth. Every time it talks about man’s sin and God’s intent, the context is always “creation” not God, and not man as God’s image. The guy who preaches “man as God’s image” is the villain. “Creation” as in “Nature” is the metanarrative here, NOT God.

And that’s when Godawa is being nice.

Continue reading